iBusinessAngel

Where Business Angels Fear to Tread?

Investors in early stage and start-up businesses are known as angel investors. The tag ‘angel’ coming from their tendency to operate in the margins where venture capitalists, banks and other backers choose not to go.

They also help plug a major funding gap to get such ventures off the ground and they happen to be the kind of investors who are prepared to take a risk, rely on their instincts and invest large sums without too many hard questions asked.

At least this is the accepted view.

But we may well be seeing a new breed of business angel emerge, one that takes a more conservative approach in these risk averse times.

Times, as Bob Dylan once sang, are a-changing as we see a trend emerging both in the UK and the US for a more cautious approach to investing in embryonic stage businesses. With many investors’ fingers burnt by the financial crisis it is hardly surprising that the appetite for risk remains limited – which in turn is making it increasingly harder for start-up businesses to attract funding.

According to the latest NESTA report on business angel activity in the UK, 83 per cent of angel investments were made with co-investors and a significant proportion (28 per cent) were made within just 50 kilometres of home. Working close to home and in the company of fellow investors shows that most business angels need security like anyone else and are careful where they put their money. The figures debunk any myths suggesting otherwise.

This is further borne out by statistics released in the US where an article this month in BusinessWeek suggests angel investors are getting pickier based on their analysis of data supplied by Angelsoft, an internet based company supplying online tools to angel investors.

The study looks at the share of companies seeking angel funds passing through each stage of the ‘deal funnel’ between 2007-2009. Not surprisingly, given the economic climate in the past two years, a glance at the chart reveals a dramatic decline in the number of businesses getting even as far as the screening process between 2007 and 2009. The statistics make worrying reading for anyone hoping for an easy ride when they approach potential investors for their start-up if the pattern is repeated her in the UK. .

More worrying still, just 2.8% of businesses made it as far as the due diligence stage, a fall of more than 50% on 2007/08 figures. This would indicate that angel investors in the US have become, as the article suggests, more ‘picky’.

But is it simply a case of angel investors becoming more picky? The figures reveal that just under half of businesses make it through screening to the due diligence phase, which is a pattern that has been broadly repeated since 2007.

However even though there were around 50% less businesses making it through the deal funnel, when we reach the end of the funnel and to what those business are striving to achieve i.e. investment, the proportion of those businesses making it through the final stages, is shown to be higher in 2009 than in 2007 or 2008, with 2.8% making it to due diligence and 2.1% securing investment.

Herein lies the good news for those businesses who sought funding. The proportion of businesses receiving funding in 2009 compared to 2008 suggests that if a business made it to the due diligence stage, there was a significantly better chance of securing investment.

The small percentage of businesses that made it through screening and the presentation phase also stood a greater chance of making it to the end of the deal funnel. This may suggest that angel investors are indeed becoming more choosy, but it could well be more a case of less money in the angel investor’s pot making it tougher to get past this initial screening process.

We know that more than half of investments fail; therefore it doesn’t take a great leap of the imagination to conclude that angel investors are willing to take fewer risks than they once were. This will be bad news for many start-ups and there will be many innovative businesses that fail to get a vital injection of capital. The number of businesses that have slipped through the net since 2007 is anyone’s guess.

It isn’t all bad news, according to the figures in the US business angels are choosing to invest in a greater proportion of those businesses that make it through screening. But we may be seeing that even business angels have their limits.

Start-ups just aren’t feeling the love from banks right now

It may have been Valentines Day yesterday, but with banks’ reluctance to lend to businesses, they could push more start-ups into the arms of angel investors.

With UK banks still showing a reluctance to lend to businesses, companies could well be forced to look towards alternative sources to fund their ventures. The recession may be over, but with UK GDP figures just crawling over the line into positive territory, how are the banks doing? Those vital foundations of a functioning economy and an equally vital source of lending for start-up enterprises.

Banks may well have received an eye watering £850 billion of taxpayers’ money to keep them afloat but a glance through last week’s House of Commons Committee report, ‘Maintaining financial stability across the United Kingdom’s banking system’ the crisis of confidence that has haunted banks since 2007 appears to have a sting in the tail for businesses in the UK seeking funding.

Despite recent declarations that they are ‘open for business’ banks are still struggling to help those innovative start-up companies the country needs to help UK plc climb out of recession are still being starved of investment. Lending to business, as the report suggests, is ‘falling short of legally-binding commitments entered into by two of the banks that received the most support: the Royal Bank of Scotland (RBS) and Lloyds Banking Group’

The reasons for the banks’ inability to meet their lending commitments are unclear but when it comes to small or medium sized business, lending in a downturn is perceived as even more risky than usual. This creates a paradox where businesses are starved of the vital capital they need to grow which in turn can lead to the failure of those businesses vital to a flourishing economy.

This can only be bad news in the long term for banks looking to bolster their balance sheets. So where can businesses turn to for help? The obvious answer is angel investors.

What has become an age of austerity for the banks could be a golden age for angel investors, those wealthy individuals willing to take a calculated gamble on start-up companies. But it isn’t just start-up capital angel investors will need to provide if banks continue to refuse or give unfavourable terms to businesses hoping to borrow.

According to an article in this week’s Scotsman, angel investors in Scotland are increasingly acting as bankers to fledgling companies, providing £1 million in overdrafts or loans in the past twelve months. Angel investors are also being asked to act as debt providers in the absence of loan and overdraft facilities offered to businesses by banks.

It isn’t just in Scotland that banks are perceived as the villains for taking taxpayers’ money and showing reluctance to lend to businesses. Ask any business owner or entrepreneur in the UK and you are likely to hear that trust in banks is at a low-point.

This could well be good news for business angels, if not for entrepreneurs struggling to launch their businesses. As we have established angel investors are becoming more picky with the businesses they invest in, therefore for all but the most promising businesses, there will be no easy alternative and the door will remain firmly shut when it comes to accessing vital capital.

But what this means for business angels, who unlike banks require an equity stake in the businesses in return for investment, is they can now afford to be even more choosy when faced with more choice. Due to the perception that banks are the villains when it comes to lending, those businesses with the most potential will be more likely to take the angel investment route rather than approach the banks.

And for those entrepreneurs who do make it through the deal funnel, they can gain access to valuable advice and coaching from those who have been there before, rather than just cash from the bank.

There is a caveat. How many of these extra businesses seeking capital from business angels will be viable? According to the banks, one reason they haven’t been able to reach their lending target is the higher proportion of those companies needing credit not having viable business models.

This leads us to two conclusions. Business angels will need to be more wary when it comes to assessing the viability of companies. Banks meanwhile will need to be careful that their reluctance to lend now creates an irreversible trend of the best businesses turning to business angels for their start-up capital now and in the future.

Angelic Agreement? But will it stay heavenly?

More than half of business angel investments fail, but why? How much of this can be put down to the innate vulnerability of start-up businesses?

Surely having an enthusiastic angel investor on board, eager to provide a timely injection of funding to ensure success should mean failure rates i.e. those leaving the business angel out of pocket come exit time should statistically be on the better side of half.

Yet this clearly isn’t the case. In an ideal world entrepreneurs and the angel investors are made for each other, a real match made in heaven as the title to this blog suggests. Put simply most start-ups require money and if it seems like a good idea, most angel investors on the lookout for new opportunities  are eager to supply it – and make a decent return in five years or perhaps less. Perfect, the entrepreneur gets his money, establishes a viable business and the angel investor rides off into the sunset profit in hand ready to fund the next venture.

But life isn’t that simple. Good relationships are crucial to the stability and success of a business. Relationships need not necessarily be cordial at all times, debate and alternative viewpoints are healthy and can be productive , but like all relationships in life, certain elements must be in place to ensure relationships don’t unravel and become destructive.

While some angel investors will be looking more at business structures and the ideas and innovations those businesses are bringing to their market, it would be wrong to ignore the importance of the individuals who run businesses – the management team and the person(s) leading them.

The most successful investors should put fairly large sums into two or three businesses they know something about and whose management is trustworthy, at least this is what the most astute investors like Keynes and more recently Warren Buffet would tell you.

Finding out if the managers of the business you invest in are trustworthy isn’t easy. First you must establish a relationship. We often speak of relationships as having the right chemistry and it is crucial for the angel investor to feel that chemistry when he meets the entrepreneur he’s willing to invest in for the next four, five or maybe more years.

This is no easy task. Not all angel investors are entrepreneurs and many entrepreneurs don’t have the right instincts or ideas to make their business a success even with the help of investment as the statistics show. There can often be gaps in age and experience between business angel and entrepreneur. Take for example an ambitious 18-year-old fresh out of college, full of ideas and exuberance, the business angel who invests in the business may have a wealth of experience to offer, but will he/she be able to pass that knowhow, as well as money, on to ensure a successful future? There may well be gaps in age and understanding as well as experience.

If both angel investor and entrepreneur lack experience of starting up and developing a business, the relationship might turn into a voyage of discovery for both which may then flounder on rough seas. No matter how much money is invested, at least one party should know how to make the best use of it and both investor and entrepreneur must be able to work together and have their interests in alignment to achieve success and a positive return on investment.

Increasingly these days, angel investors are opting to join business angel networks and groups to spread risk rather than be faced with the possibility of choosing the wrong business to invest in. While this approach may have its advantages it will naturally create a distance between them and the entrepreneur. The cash may well pour into the business, but can the entrepreneur be trusted? This is a major question to consider, and also is the entrepreneur self-disciplined to spend the money wisely?

Investing too much money too soon can be toxic for a start-up particularly when an entrepreneur may lack focus or is prone to taking risks with your money.This brings us back to relationships, put simply, the business angel’s role is to invest not only money but also add value. For the relationship to work, therefore, the entrepreneur must be flexible, be willing to be mentored, work as part of a team and frugal with the money at his/her disposal.

Keeping these tips in mind should ensure that at least (market forces permitting) it will be the business that fails rather than the business relationship.