Looking for a business angel network in the UK? Well, look no further, that the

If you are providing services to business angels, please feel free to click here to add your free business angel lisiting too if you have a suitable service. Each entry will be reviewed and added if appropriate.

There is a tendency among entrepreneurs to chase money wherever they find it. The pressure to find the financial resources so necessary to build a business can be over-mastering. Most of the time the partnerships which form between founders and angel investors are productive but, in a few cases, I have seen it turn very destructive. Companies that should have realized success have been held back by investor partnerships that have severely limited their potential or, in some cases, doomed them to failure.

Look Beyond the Checkbook

It may be hard to be discriminating when you are in the heat of the ‘money hunt’ but the sins of omission you commit while chasing investors can return ten-fold to destroy any chance of success. The problem can become acute because of the incredible range of circumstances, experience and interests that angel investors bring to the table. Their having money to invest is not enough. You need to understand their basic motivations and what is driving them to act as an angel investor. You also need to understand that all investment money is not the same. Some money will help you succeed while other investments will be a poisoned pill that will reduce your chances of building the business you envision. Here are some ‘sacred cows’ that you need to slaughter:

• Angel investors are in it for a return on their investment: Well, how can you argue with that? You would assume that the primary driver is always a return on investment. But, as you will read further on, that is not always the case. I know angel investors who are simply bored and looking for something to do and others who are frustrated CEO-wannabees. For some investors, it is all about a return but for others the return is secondary. You need to sort these two groups out. Do not listen just to what they say; it is what they do that is important.
• They have money so they must be smart: This is another fallacy. Some of the dumbest and most self-destructive people I have ever met are wealthy. I have found only a weak correlation between wealth and intelligence and a slimmer one between wealth and wisdom. Many a destructive hubris has been built on a fat bank account. Investors have an important role in start-ups but pretense, omnipotence or omniscience can warp an investor’s understanding of that role. Smart investors play their part in a highly professional and constructive manner. Seek them out; they are most likely the winners you want to associate with.
• They have been successful in business so they will know how we can be: Past success is not always a good indicator of wisdom going forward. In fact, great success can be counter-productive when they decide to work with start-up companies. I know one investor who continually regales his CEOs with stories of how he ran his company. Of course, the company was running over one hundred million annually when these stories took place. The CEOs, wanting to emulate his success, take steps that are entirely premature. The result is wasted resources and a dysfunctional corporate culture. Past business success is not a good indicator of professional performance as an investor. Remember, you are seeking an investor, not a shadow CEO.
• They will become my close personal friends and advisers: Not a good idea; the correct focus of investors should produce a tension in the relationship with management. If you want a friend, buy a dog.

The Bad and the Very Ugly

The problem with writing about angel investors is that they come in an amazing variety. I have met lots of them and there is always something different about each. The ease of entry into the field may have something to do with it. The only real entry requirement is wealth beyond current needs. That’s all it takes to become an angel investor. There are no educational requirements, courses to take or certifications to merit. Only a bank account and a decision to ‘invest’ are required to hang out a shingle and open up for business. Watch out for the following:

• The Shadow CEO: I have met investors who purposefully pick weak or inexperienced CEOs to work with. Their real agenda is to run your company from the back seat. These investors are very intrusive and will push you to make decisions and commit resources that will put your company at risk. They are mostly successful entrepreneurs who have built and sold a business. In the process, they have lost touch with the necessary energy levels and passion that is essential to building a start-up into a going business. Mostly they remember the later stages of their company and the extended staff they had. Then they turn the CEO into a kind of executive assistant and attempt to run the company by proxy. Most of the companies in the portfolio of this type of investor remain very small. They generally have very complex Excel spreadsheet projections and poor records in meeting them. Stay away from the Shadow CEO; they are very dangerous investors.
• The Crazy, Rich Uncle: This is probably the most dangerous type of angel investor because they are so easy on the management team. They are mostly retired and living comfortably. Their mission in life is to ‘give back to the younger generation’. A clear indication of this type is the total lack of performance metrics and a weak statement of expectations. They can be very seductive to entrepreneurs but there is a dark side. Without stiff set of performance metrics, the company can develop a culture of permissiveness. That will feel good until the money runs out. A key indicator of this type is the feeling that the amounts of money involved are, at least initially, not sufficient to cause them concern. The expenditure patterns are not carefully monitored and discussions do not turn serious until the money is spent and the wolves are at the door. As an entrepreneur, you need to seek out investors who will be hard on you; insisting on strict performance metrics and precise definitions of roles. Take the easy way out and you will be in for a ride to nowhere with a crazy, rich uncle. Sure you will enjoy the ride but, in the end, you will be let off the bus in the middle of nowhere with a tarnished reputation for failure.
• The Gaggle: Remember the old saying about a camel being a horse designed by a committee? These gaggles are fond of that kind of engagement. The investments that they make are very often selected in a very casual way and supervised fairly loosely. The problem comes as the group itself is very loosely organized. Different participants might have significantly different understandings of what it mean to be an investor and what that status entitles them to. This can range from complete indifference to total immersion in the management of the company. This situation can result in lots of pulling and pushing of the management team without an overarching strategic vision. Investments should be made based on clear and concise understandings codified in a detailed investment agreement.
• The Bottom Feeders: You will meet some investors who are really only interested in your intellectual property. They ‘drag the bottom’ of the entrepreneurial community looking for weak teams with good ideas. Mostly they insist that their funding be used to develop the technology rather than developing revenues. Once the money runs out, they regretfully inform management that they are closing the company down and taking the intellectual property as compensation for their investment.
• The Lead Broker: I have seen these lead brokers promote themselves into central roles in companies without putting much of any of their own money on the line. The net result is that the bulk of the investor group gets involved without much direct knowledge of the business or the management team. In one case, such a broker put together an investment in excess of one million dollars without making any investment of his own. He still managed a seat on the board and a dominate role in the management of the company. Be particularly careful of the broker who can invest but does not. This situation can turn nasty if expectations are not met. Finger pointing and recriminations can come to dominate the relationships among the investors. This could seriously damage chances of follow-on investments by the group.

The Good

Good angel investors always take a highly professional approach to the process and their portfolio companies. They generally focus in industries that they are familiar with. It is a good idea to avoid angel investors whose portfolio companies do not fit a close pattern. The best angel investors will often forgo the option of claiming a board seat and, instead, insist that an independent board member with professional experience be appointed. Beware of investors who seem to see investment in your company as an opportunity to enhance their reputation by sitting on yet another board. Here are some positive things to look for:

• Success Breeds Success: There are angel investors who have the knack to help their portfolio companies thrive; while others seem to doom them to failure or stagnation. I know of one angel who specializes in little deals and has a well developed ability to keep them that way. Other investors seem to have the opposite skill. Their companies grow and prosper. It is a good idea to do some diligence on the track record of the investor. Go with the successful ones even if the deal terms are less generous.
• The Investment Agreement: There ought to be a detailed investment agreement agreed to before any funds are transferred. This agreement should be very specific when it comes to the roles and responsibilities of each party. The best agreements provide for an earn-in by management based on performance. It also sets the ground rules for further investment. Good angel investors will require this as a matter of course. The worst ones will simply require a term sheet and then write a check. Remember that the absence of planning is the road to failure. Think of the investment agreement as a strategic plan for the relationship.
• Strategic Agreement on Roles and Responsibilities: Good angel investors will insist that the roles and responsibilities for each party be very well understood from the very beginning. These roles will be codified in the investment agreement and specify the actions that each party will be able to take under a range of possible outcomes. Although such an agreement can complicate initial negotiations, it will help greatly when performance does not meet expectations and realignment become necessary.
• Use of Proceeds: I have seen investors write rather large checks without insisting that there be an agreed upon use of proceeds. You can imagine what happened then. Entrepreneurs initially like the freedom to simply take the money and spend it as they see fit. But, more often than not, this leads to waste and spending on things that do not connect directly to the success of the company. One company, upon receiving funds in this way, spent a lot of the money on new laptops and cell phones with expensive service plans. They replaced very serviceable units. Another CEO kept paying his salary, even through results fell far below projections, and failed to pay suppliers. The result was a law suit that is almost certain to shut down the company. It is good business practice for the angel investors to insist on a detailed use of proceeds and for control over the spending of their money.
• Insistence on Performance Metrics: As a CEO you should be insisting on performance metrics for every member of your team. That is just good management. Your investors should take the same approach. It may seem initially easier to deal with angel investors who are very lax about this, but it is far from best practices. I am not just talking about Excel spreadsheet metrics. They have to be much more detailed than that. Good performance metrics detail the responsibilities of each member of the management team and the way their performance will be measured. Everybody from the CEO to the receptionist should have a job description with metrics attached. And the metrics should be sufficiently detailed to drive evaluations based on performance. Performance should be the driver in determining both compensation and earned-in interest in the company. Performance metrics are a sign of a professional and productive organization. Start-ups with that culture have a much higher chance of success.
• Focus on Governance Issues and Oversight: “Who’s minding the store?” If the answer to that question is “nobody but us entrepreneurs”, consider that a red flag. In the short-term, it may feel good to be free from oversight but, in the long-term, you are guaranteed to make more mistakes and waste more opportunities. The board of directors has a very important role to fill in any corporate structure and it is not just making sure that the investors get to a liquidity event as soon as possible. Good governance means overseeing the strategic planning process, dealing with issues of succession, audit and compensation, and providing for the protections and expansion of shareholder value. This fiduciary relationship with the shareholders is an important part of the corporate structure. Without it, management is under no effective supervision and the investment looks more like a roll of the dice than an investment.

Keep This In Mind

An angel investment creates a relationship that will help determine how successful you are going to be. Your skill in crafting that relationship is a test of how dedicated you are to the success of your company and team. If you take the easy way out, your chances of success will drop significantly. If you opt for the limp relationship with an inattentive investor, your prospects will suffer. Angel investors, the good ones, bring much more than money to the table. The good ones have helped their companies succeed and will help you do the same.

© Dr. Earl R. Smith II

~~~~~~~~~~

Dr. Smith is Managing Partner of The Federal Circle. The Federal Circle partners with teams and existing companies. We help them up their game and win big in the Federal space. We also arrange funding for acquisitions and expansion by acquisition. Our model is based on the belief that, if you select the very best and work with them in a highly professional and focused manner, the results will be truly amazing. He is the author of Amazing Pace: Turbo-charged Business Development – a book that shows how Advisory Boards can dramatically increase revenue. Dr. Smith is also the author of Dream Walk: Parables for the Living – a book of Raven Tales and exploration.

Eileen has held senior leadership roles at Yahoo!, Skype, PalmSource, Openwave, Sun Microsystems, Apple and Verizon Wireless. She is currently involved in establishing White Bear Yard in London for technology innovation and startups, Eileen is also an advisor to Ambient Sound Investments.

What made you decide to become a business angel?
After Skype I teamed up to work with the founding engineers again, who had set up a small early stage venture fund, Ambient Sound Investments (www.asi.ee), and through the course of evaluating potential investments for them I realised there were certain projects or teams that I wanted to personally support – even if ASI elected not to.  It’s a habit or tendency I’ve been trying to break ever since…!

What do you look for in a business you decide to invest in?
The most important facets of a business I would invest in are its founding team – and the people behind it, starting it and/or also supporting it.  I think life is too short – and there are too many interesting projects out there – to spend one’s time with people who don’t somehow enhance your working/general life and day to day interactions.

How important has your expertise in technology been in helping you choose the right businesses?
I believe that it’s been helpful, but you never do know what you don’t know, so I may actually not have as much expertise as I’d like to think!  I feel that it helps the most in being able to relate to technology founders and in assessing the challenges and decision points in building and growing an early-stage technology business.  By the same token, I try to only evaluate businesses in which I have some basic level of understanding, so for example I would stay away from robotics or artificial intelligence, genomes or an area in which I had no understanding.

Should anyone who hopes to invest in this area have the right technical knowledge to help them make the right decision?
I believe it helps, but with early-stage investment decisions, one’s gut and intuition is often what makes the final call.  So whatever data points will help to influence that are always helpful.  Perhaps sometimes the people (and existing support around those people/team) are enough.

What do you think will be the next big thing in Internet technology?
If I knew that I’d be strictly focused on that – and not investing in or working on anything else!  That said, I don’t know what I feel will bring the biggest change from a “technology point of view”, but I think a lot of opportunities lie in how the technology will be applied, consumed or impact on existing commercial models and products/services.

Is now a good time to start a business in the UK?
I think it’s always a good time to start a business, but particularly now as there is a talent pool established and some tastes of success to whet entrepreneurs, employees and investors’ appetites.

According to the British Business Angels Association only 5% of business angels in the UK are women, why do you think the numbers are so low?
I couldn’t really say and have wondered the same thing myself, but at the same time I feel it’s important to take this statistic into context with the larger business world.  So for example, as I understand it, only 3% of FTSE 100 companies are run by women.  If that’s the case, perhaps the fact that 5% of business angels are female is a positive sign.  Women’s participation/involvement in business (either as employees/team members, executive leaders, directors, advisors or investors) in general needs to be considered – and once that grows, so will the proportion of business angels I’m sure.

What advice would you give to other women looking to get involved in angel investing?
Please go ahead and get started, and feel free to contact me if you want any encouragement or suggestions on where or how!

http://www.linkedin.com/in/eileenburbidge, Twitter handle @eileentso

White Bear Yard website: http://whitebearyard.com

Various firms have been developing psychometric tests to identify the personality traits of a successful entrepreneur and it turns out, that there is no agreement on whether any of these work.  So what can research tell us?

In fact, funding of research into entrepreneurial issues in the academic world is beginning to dry up – as Durham University have closed their department for entrepreneurial research, partly in response to the failed hope of being able to teach entrepreneurial skills to carefully selected students.

So, if business angels can’t find a common personality trait, what should an investor look for when interviewing cash hungry entrepreneurs?

Well, there appear to be two ideas that can be supported in the accademic research.

Firstly, becoming a highly successful entrepreneur is a process. It takes time and you can make a pretty good judgement – after interviewing – where someone is on their business path. A colleague of mine suggested that a really experienced entrepreneur is someone who has built a business and lost it, built a second and exited with a healthy gain and now is on their third business.

Okay, you can discuss alternative formula – but you get the idea.

Secondly, how the entrepreneur is able to respond to what is going on around him or her is a critical factor that determines if they are likely to succeed. Or perhaps, to put it another way, how do they deal with uncertainty and difficult situations?

This reminds me of the famous story of the criminal who said ‘I had no choice, I became a criminal because my father was a drunk’ and his brother said ‘I had no choice either, I had to succeed’ . The successful brother became CEO of a global business.

So, in summary, you can forget personality and therefore personality testing. Look instead for where the entrepreneur is on the path and then asking searching questions about how they dealt with uncertainty.

So, the good news is that there is evidence of there being a way to systematically identify likely successful entrepreneurs – and also the quality of the team – and your fellow investors – that surround the entrepreneur.

Good luck.

Big cuts are on the horizon for regional business development

Chancellor George Osborne’s announcement that the Business Department will bear the brunt of £6 billion cuts, could well signal difficult times to come for those businesses seeking regional development aid…

But help could be at hand if business angel numbers expand. As Labour’s ‘big government’ philosophy is unravelled by new kids on the block George Osborne and David Laws, this could affect new business enterprises who rely on development agencies and associated bodies to get them on the first rung of the ladder.

The aim of RDAs is to help create businesses through the fostering of entrepreneurship and growth in their respective regions. However,  according to a report by the Tapayers’ Alliance  success has been limited and, if figures between 1992 and 1996 are anything to go by,  over the course of 14 years the rate of business creation has fallen overall.

This is hardly surprising. Most businesses in the start-up phase will require support which includes money and advice. The former is often in short supply and only given out according to strict criteria and whether the sector is fashionable. Money is one thing, there will be other sources of funding available to the entrepreneur, but with businesses in for example emerging creative industries, access to expert advice  and money may well be in short supply in some areas.

It is understandable then that with this kind of limited success and with £6 billion of spending cuts to find, that the business development department is high on the list of the government’s targets for cuts ─ £836 million worth to be exact.

With cutbacks to a public sector service that was already struggling to deliver, The input of people like business angels will become vital in the years to come as those who are starting up businesses exhaust the goodwill of friends and family and search for support elsewhere. With cutbacks in development funding, and business lending from the UK’s banks still in short supply, business angels will be increasingly called upon to play the role of advisors as well as investors, which many do already.

The growth in the number of organised regional business angel networks in the UK in recent years goes some way towards plugging the gap in advice and funding while help from elsewhere is in short supply. However, with many appealing for more members there is clearly a shortfall in the number of business angels.

Without the valuable support angel investors can provide in terms of expertise those starting up businesses or those looking to take them to the next level may find themselves starved of advice and cash in some cases and forced to explore innovative ways to grow their business. Alternatively they could well be left to feel their way in the dark or, worse still, a promising idea may not be developed into a profitable business.

Enterprise and business is among the key drivers of growth in the UK economy. While government departments have lacked the required agility to support new ideas in rapidly developing sectors in recent years, such drastic cuts in funding could still see those businesses who would have benefited from some kind of government support left high and dry. It is clear that the new UK government’s strategy is to strike some kind of balance which won’t upset all of the people, but a possible imbalance in support for new business will need to be addressed.

Most entrepreneurs will have the instinct to succeed in what they do regardless of changes in government policy, but it would be unrealistic to expect business angels to suddenly ride to the rescue if the axe falls on government help. Firstly, there is an even greater burden of risk to carry, particularly in the current economic climate and there will be less chance of an early profitable exit than in recent years. A big consideration when most angel investors will be looking for a profit inside 3 years.

The number of business angels in the UK is tiny in comparison to the USA where we have just heard that new business creation hit a 14-year peak in 2009 according to The Kauffman Index of Entrepreneurial Activity. This was despite the worst recession in living memory and goes a long way towards revealing US appetite for enterprise.

We may well see a growth in the number of business angels in the UK who are passionate about supporting business creation. We might also see opposition to the decision to put the business development department on the chopping block, but as statistics in the US have proved, even in the worst of times there are more than enough people ready to take a risk.

The significant contribution the OION Network made to the growth of early stage businesses was also recognised with the award of Business Angel Network of the Year by the British Business Angels Association – seeing off competition from rivals including Angels Den, Envestors LLP, Central England Business Angels, Octopus Investor Group and South E

OION’s investor members invested nearly £1 million in 16 companies during the past financial year. This direct investment enabled the firms to leverage an additional £5 million of funding from other sources.

What does your brand stand for?

So, how do you do it….?

Before you do anything else – do your businesses’ websites have a Copyright symbol and a date at the end of every page?

If not, go and request it is done right now!

Copyright is the best and only free way to defend ideas – but it does require the business owner to claim it.

Simply by adding Copyright to a written piece of work, or drawing, or report you can establish rights over the material. If you wish to go further, you can print the work and ask a lawyer to sign it – again, this logs your claim, with a specific date and the signature adds authority to the claim.

Copyright is free and applies worldwide. So, do it now.

Okay, so how do you defend an idea that goes beyond just copyright?

Essentially there are two routes, both of which cost money to set up and maintain

1. Trademark – which is used for brand names, straplines and brand designs; and
2. Patent – which is used for scientific formulea and other similar items

In the UK and Europe it is not possible to patent a business process for instance, although the application of these rules in the USA can be different.

Also, both trademarks and patents are granted for

• a geographical area (eg UK, Europe, Internationally, US etc…)
• a fixed period (typically 10 years)

in addition, trademarks are granted for

• a class of business (there are 45 classes, and your trademark can be registered for one or more of these classes)

So which do you choose? Well, if you have a scientific formula or discovery, then patents – otherwise, all else will be trademark.

Now, here is the interesting thing – you can have a business idea which can be copied (and will be if it is successful) but if your business also generates a strong brand – then the brand can not be copied.

For instance, a high quality sports shirt without any branding might cost £5 (or US$7.50) but put the Adidas brand on the shirt, and the same high quality shirt might cost £25 (or US$37.50).

Can the shirt structure and shape/ form be copied, mostly yes! Can the Adidas brand name – or the 3 stripe logo or use of similar logo designs be copied, no, not at all!

Now, there will inevitably be disputes here – but the point is this. Most businesses are unable to protect their IP other than through trademarks.

Therefore, a business which does not have copyrights nor patents at the heart of its business will therefore need to depend on and defend its brand name and brand design.

Equally, the point for business angel investors is that this requires a fledgling business to think carefully about how it creates and builds its brand name, brand image, brand design and how it uses that brand.

For instance, careful application of a consistent brand will be a key part of proving that this particular use of design belongs to you. Equally, sloppy application of the brand – not adhering to standard colours, shapes or sizes, will make your brand vulnerable to attack.

Hence, for most investments, the real value of the business is the brand - and the premium price that you are able to charge for your product (say a sports shirt) by using that brand consistently.

Lastly, the more widely your brand is used within any class of business, then the more established it becomes and the easier it is to defend.

Therefore, some activities – such as a regular newsletters or magazines (digital and/ or print) will massive increase the number of people that see your brand, and this will play a key part in establishing your unique right to use that brand.

So, to summarise, get your copyright rights for free now. If you can patent, do so – otherwise focus on your brand.

And your brand design and name should be

• clear and distinct
• applied consistently in all the different contexts (print, digital, business cards, letter heads, company vans, product design and packaging etc…)
• used as often as possible

If you follow these rules, then you will not only create a defendable brand, but also a valuable one and your investment will benefit from the effort and expense.

Useful websites

• UK Patent and Trademark Office http://www.ipo.gov.uk
• European Trademark Office http://oami.europa.eu and European Patent Office http://www.epo.org/
• US Trademark and Patent Office http://www.uspto.gov/

=============== Advert=======================
Establishing rights to a brand depends on how many people see
it – so how do you increase your brand visibility without it
costing a fortune? Simple, publish your own magazine under
your business brand name. This is what Media Modo can
do for your investment…
=============== Advert=======================

Stefan Glaenzer Entrepreneur turned Business Angel

Stefan is London-based entrepreneur and angel investor from Germany. He is the co-founder of companions.de, companionsTV, ricardo.de and myblog.de.

He is also the founding investor and executive Chairman of Mendeley.com and RjDj.me and has been in the same role at Last.fm.

After deciding to invest ‘a few hundred thousand’ in Last.fm this turned into a £22 million profit following its sale to CBS in 2007.  Stefan is a firm believer in European entrepreneurship and remains an active business angel. Outside of his business interests he holds a PhD in foreign exchange risk management and was a professional DJ for 15 years.

How long have you been a business angel?
My first experience as an angel investor was from 2000-2004. In 2005 I stopped investing to focus the vast majority of my time to helping build Last.fm. When we sold it in 2007, I became a full time angel again.

What attracted you towards becoming an angel investor?
It’s a function of age I’m afraid – pretty much the same reason why a football player evolves into a manager position. I love working on innovative ideas, and being an angel gives you more of an portfolio approach instead of putting all your eggs in one basket.

How has your background as an entrepreneur helped you in becoming a successful angel investor?
Even though I’m acting as an investor, my heart still is on the entrepreneurial side. Having been so long on the other side of the table gives a lot of insight in to what these companies are trying to achieve.

What types of business do you invest in?
As long as it is digital and has the potential to change the world I’m up for it. I love to invest early stage and like marketplaces, databases, music…..and revolutionary ideas

Have you made any mistakes along the way?
Any? Plenty! More than I can think of actually. I have passed on some hugely successful companies, invested in really bad companies, invested too early … just to name a few.

We are led to believe that angel investors invest close to home, so what made you travel all the way from Germany and become a business angel in the UK?
Home is where your heart is – and my heart is in Europe. London (even though it’s not on the continent) is certainly the best place to start a digital business in Europe, given the diversity of people, the access to capital and the international culture.

The business angel community in the UK is small compared to the US how does it compare to the size of the business angel community in Germany?
We are a couple of decades behind the US when it comes to successful venture investing, regardless of whether you are comparing it to the UK, Germany, France or Scandinavia. The main difference with Germany is certainly the decentral structure of doing business compared to other countries. You do have a lot of business angels in Germany, but they are distributed over the whole country.

Where Business Angels Fear to Tread?

Investors in early stage and start-up businesses are known as angel investors. The tag ‘angel’ coming from their tendency to operate in the margins where venture capitalists, banks and other backers choose not to go.

They also help plug a major funding gap to get such ventures off the ground and they happen to be the kind of investors who are prepared to take a risk, rely on their instincts and invest large sums without too many hard questions asked.

At least this is the accepted view.

But we may well be seeing a new breed of business angel emerge, one that takes a more conservative approach in these risk averse times.

Times, as Bob Dylan once sang, are a-changing as we see a trend emerging both in the UK and the US for a more cautious approach to investing in embryonic stage businesses. With many investors’ fingers burnt by the financial crisis it is hardly surprising that the appetite for risk remains limited – which in turn is making it increasingly harder for start-up businesses to attract funding.

According to the latest NESTA report on business angel activity in the UK, 83 per cent of angel investments were made with co-investors and a significant proportion (28 per cent) were made within just 50 kilometres of home. Working close to home and in the company of fellow investors shows that most business angels need security like anyone else and are careful where they put their money. The figures debunk any myths suggesting otherwise.

This is further borne out by statistics released in the US where an article this month in BusinessWeek suggests angel investors are getting pickier based on their analysis of data supplied by Angelsoft, an internet based company supplying online tools to angel investors.

The study looks at the share of companies seeking angel funds passing through each stage of the ‘deal funnel’ between 2007-2009. Not surprisingly, given the economic climate in the past two years, a glance at the chart reveals a dramatic decline in the number of businesses getting even as far as the screening process between 2007 and 2009. The statistics make worrying reading for anyone hoping for an easy ride when they approach potential investors for their start-up if the pattern is repeated her in the UK. .

More worrying still, just 2.8% of businesses made it as far as the due diligence stage, a fall of more than 50% on 2007/08 figures. This would indicate that angel investors in the US have become, as the article suggests, more ‘picky’.

But is it simply a case of angel investors becoming more picky? The figures reveal that just under half of businesses make it through screening to the due diligence phase, which is a pattern that has been broadly repeated since 2007.

However even though there were around 50% less businesses making it through the deal funnel, when we reach the end of the funnel and to what those business are striving to achieve i.e. investment, the proportion of those businesses making it through the final stages, is shown to be higher in 2009 than in 2007 or 2008, with 2.8% making it to due diligence and 2.1% securing investment.

Herein lies the good news for those businesses who sought funding. The proportion of businesses receiving funding in 2009 compared to 2008 suggests that if a business made it to the due diligence stage, there was a significantly better chance of securing investment.

The small percentage of businesses that made it through screening and the presentation phase also stood a greater chance of making it to the end of the deal funnel. This may suggest that angel investors are indeed becoming more choosy, but it could well be more a case of less money in the angel investor’s pot making it tougher to get past this initial screening process.

We know that more than half of investments fail; therefore it doesn’t take a great leap of the imagination to conclude that angel investors are willing to take fewer risks than they once were. This will be bad news for many start-ups and there will be many innovative businesses that fail to get a vital injection of capital. The number of businesses that have slipped through the net since 2007 is anyone’s guess.

It isn’t all bad news, according to the figures in the US business angels are choosing to invest in a greater proportion of those businesses that make it through screening. But we may be seeing that even business angels have their limits.