iBusinessAngel

By Dr. Earl R. Smith II
DrSmith@Dr-Smith.com
www.Dr-Smith.com

With many companies – particularly early-stage ones – the Board of Directors is seen as little more than a legal necessity. But it can be so much more including an important force for growth and a gyroscope that keeps things on course and sure-footed.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

I work with a lot of CEOs who are trying to move their companies out of the mid to high single digit run rates. The journey from five to twenty million in annual revenue is one of the most difficult in the evolution of any company. CEOs need to reinvent themselves at least two or three times during the process.

The senior team at five million will be radically overhauled and resourced by the time the company hits twenty million. The cottage culture will have given way to an increasingly professionalizing one. The competition that the company faces in their business development efforts will be better resourced, smarter and more efficiently managed. 

By the time a company reaches the high teens in annual revenue, the whole question of governance becomes a significant issue. Management will be spending a lot more time managing the business. The original team, with their overblown titles, will have been replaced with new faces that actually have the skill sets necessary to carry them.

In the best of all worlds the recruiter who had the title VP of HR is now replaced with an individual who understands, and can effectively deal with, the HR issues that can bring a company down. The controller who had the title VP of Finance or CFO has been replaced with a person who can manage banking relationships, oversee an increasingly complex financial reporting system, keep track of a complicated options and equity ownership situation and effectively manage relationships with investors and potential investors. There may be a more experienced COO and possibly even a Chief Administrative Officer (CAO) on the team.

Read more…

By Dr. Earl R. Smith II
DrSmith@Dr-Smith.com
www.Dr-Smith.com

Most angel investors, when funding a start-up, ignore the structure and operation of the board of directors. Most early-stage companies that I work with have only a casually structured board that seems to exist to satisfy legal requirements. Accumulated experience has shown me that this is a very risky approach. A board has defined obligations that are important to the future of any company. Boards unable to fulfill these obligations severely limit possibilities. Here are some of the guidelines that I offer when working with these start-ups: 

Composition: A well functioning board is independent of the management team. Friends and family do not meet that test. A board, which is simply a rubber stamp or doormat, creates an imbalance within the organizations culture – key functions are untended or receive short shrift. A functioning board should have a majority of independent members. In my view, the term independent excludes both members of the senior team and investors.

Balance: All the rhetoric aside, the tendencies of management are inherently tactical and self-serving. The CEO is – or should be – focused on implementing the strategic and tactical plans. All implementation is inherently tactical. The team’s compensation – if it is correctly structured – should depend heavily on meeting those metrics and delivering on the plans. Even the most experienced CEO work this way. That implies an unbalanced emphasis on the tactical. An independent board acts as a counterbalance to this tendency.

Read more…