<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: An Extinction Level Event for Seed Funding?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ibusinessangel.com/2010/07/an-extinction-level-event-for-seed-funding/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ibusinessangel.com/2010/07/an-extinction-level-event-for-seed-funding/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=an-extinction-level-event-for-seed-funding</link>
	<description>Wisdom for Business Angel Investors</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 16:44:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil Lewis</title>
		<link>http://www.ibusinessangel.com/2010/07/an-extinction-level-event-for-seed-funding/comment-page-1/#comment-608</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil Lewis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 17:17:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibusinessangel.com/?p=717#comment-608</guid>
		<description>Very interesting piece Brett.

I think the period to exit hides a bigger problem - and that is about risk and commitment.

The chances of a broad mix of people (young CEOs and mates - or partners, experienced business angels and VC investors) all with different agendas, being able to stick to a single path and vision for 7 years is very unlikely.

I reckon you can keep this eccletic group together for 3 or 4 or perhps 5 years (ie worse case - after 3 years, you start to prepare for exit) but 7 years?

I think the real issue with the length to exit is that most business angels aren´t willing to go 7 years - and those that are, don´t believe a 7 year plan will hold together long enough to reach the exit.

The solution? Well, entrepreneurs need to get the first 3 years of growth out of the way before asking for cash - then the cash simply comes as a 4 year commitment to reach a more probable exit.

So, the real issue is - can entrepreneurs manage the first 3 years on their own? Well, if they can, the chances are that they&#039;ll manage the last 4 years too!

br
Neil</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting piece Brett.</p>
<p>I think the period to exit hides a bigger problem &#8211; and that is about risk and commitment.</p>
<p>The chances of a broad mix of people (young CEOs and mates &#8211; or partners, experienced business angels and VC investors) all with different agendas, being able to stick to a single path and vision for 7 years is very unlikely.</p>
<p>I reckon you can keep this eccletic group together for 3 or 4 or perhps 5 years (ie worse case &#8211; after 3 years, you start to prepare for exit) but 7 years?</p>
<p>I think the real issue with the length to exit is that most business angels aren´t willing to go 7 years &#8211; and those that are, don´t believe a 7 year plan will hold together long enough to reach the exit.</p>
<p>The solution? Well, entrepreneurs need to get the first 3 years of growth out of the way before asking for cash &#8211; then the cash simply comes as a 4 year commitment to reach a more probable exit.</p>
<p>So, the real issue is &#8211; can entrepreneurs manage the first 3 years on their own? Well, if they can, the chances are that they&#8217;ll manage the last 4 years too!</p>
<p>br<br />
Neil</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

